Re: [Po4a-devel]Call for a (La)TeX module

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:59:54PM +0100, Nicolas Pettiaux (AEL) wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:19:33 +0100, Nicolas François wrote > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:46:53PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > > this is a very decent start, please commit it. Just rename it to LaTeX.pm > > > before. The case is important, and Latex is different. > > > > Do you rather TeX or LaTeX? > > definitively LaTeX. It is more flexible. Sorry. I wasn't clear. It was about the module name. If the parser can parse LaTeX, it should probably also be able to parse TeX. Maybe TeX (alone) is not used anymore, and it's better to name the module LaTeX.

I'm asking this because renaming a file in the CVS repository is not really convenient. > > Any drawback in converting \\ to \newline? > > I don't think so ... provided \newlines is accepted by LaTex (which I > don't remember and can"t find now). \newline is mentioned in the JoliManuelPourLatex, but it is not clear if it is equivalent. \newline may cause an issue in the tabular environment. maybe \newline doesn't support the optional argument that \\ does. So I will try to do without this conversion.

> > * Is there any problem if a space is added at the end of lines? > no That's cool.