I'm not sure if I have join this mail list. I don't know how to join as there isn't a how-to on the website. I hope you can receive my email.
I found po4a when doing some translation, and found that there's not a complete Simplified Chinese translation for po4a, so I do the work. I create a project on transifex, a localization platform, see www.transifex.com/projects/p/po4a-translation. I wonder how could I see the final result? Where are the translation installed?
If you're interested in the Simplified Chinese translation for po4a, please join the language team on transifex.com, you can also request language on transifex.
send from hottea's openSUSE
the truth is that the development of po4a is kinda stopped since a few
years. We do the basic maintainance, like reviewing and applying
proposed patches (with some delays), but I don't manage to devote any
time to the new wanted features myself. I'm sorry about that, but this
is a fact.
As a result, I think that you should develop this module yourself. I
understand that Perl will make your brain burn as a Ruby programmer,
but at the end, developping a new module for po4a is very easy. And I
can guide you in this process if you go that way.
Check the doc on writing a new module, here:
I think that this is a good idea to keep both the upstream list and
the debian bug in CC while discussing it. It will ensure both a good
diffusion and a good archiving of the discussions.
Good luck, Mt.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:35:21PM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: po4a
> Version: 0.47-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Hello and thanks for developing po4a.
> As discussed on the po4a-devel mailing list , it would be great
> if po4a supported the Ruby document format .
>  https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/po4a-devel/2016-June/002364.html
>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Document_format
> Could you please implement support for it in an appropriate module,
> so that I could, for instance, do something like:
> $ po4a-gettextize -f rd -m apt-listbugs -p doc-apt-listbugs.pot
> The Ruby document format is processed by package rdtool (among other
> possible tools) and is described in its documentation .
>  https://github.com/uwabami/rdtool/blob/master/doc/rd-draft.rd
> I hope implementing this additional module is not too hard.
> Please let me know.
> Thanks a lot for your time!
Reject: Figure 3 is unclear. -- Bastard Reviewer From Hell