On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:40:49 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote:
[...]
I had a quick lookup at your work, and it looks very promising to me.
I'm glad to read this, thanks for your fast feedback.
A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our
infrastructure, somewhere under t/ Once you have some automated tests,
I will happily integrate your work in the main archive.
This is where I need your help most: could you please do the conversion
yourself?
I am convinced that this would be the best option, since I have zero
familiarity with the test infrastructure used in po4a and I am afraid
I would mess everything up... :-p
Then, the next step will be to test your work against the existing
Ruby documentation, and fix it until it works properly.
I'll try and find a little more time and test Rd.pm against some
existing Ruby documentation.
I saw the
documented limitations, but I'm not sure of how bad they are,
considering the existing Ruby documentation.
I think we can live with the limitations, for the time being.
Anyway, one of the limitations could soon be dropped, since a friend has
just sent me a promising patch...
[...]
In any case, many thanks for this contribution, that's good work.
I am glad you liked it. Thanks for your time and for your commitment
to help me during the integration of Rd.pm into the official po4a
package!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE