Re: [Po4a-devel] Bug#827936: po4a: please implement support for Ruby document format

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:39:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:52:12 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote: > > > > Are you willing to convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a > > > test infrastructure? > > > I really hope you are, since I am not knowledgeable enough to do so by > > > myself... > > > > Yes I am. > > That's wonderful news! Thank you so much! > > > But that's 10 years since the last time I added something > > into the t/ directory, so I have to check again. Times are really > > packed right now for me, so po4a will have to way a few days/weeks. > [...] > > No need to apologize or explain personal commitments: waiting some > days or weeks is more than acceptable! :-) > It's just that I hadn't heard back from you and I needed confirmation > that you were willing to work on this aspect... > > Thanks again for your helpfulness! Dear Martin, I prepared a new version of my Rd module for po4a (version 0.14), with a new supported option to handle pure Rd documents (containing only Ruby Document formatted text, without any "=begin" line). The attached tar archive includes the module implementation and two little documents to test it (the tests/ directory also contains the various output files and two scripts). As for the previous version, I am asking you to: * review the code I wrote * review the documentation I added (I haven't tried to convert it into a man page with POD tools, so bear with me!) * test the module with po4a * convert my tests to a proper test integrated in po4a test infrastructure (the t/ directory) * include the module in the official version of po4a * upload this new po4a version to Debian unstable I hope all this can be done soon (before the stretch freeze, if possible). Many thanks for any help you may provide! :-) BTW: it seems to me that po4a/0.48-1 has waited for some 6 months in the git repository, without being uploaded to sid: any special reason for that? P.S.: Please remember to keep me in Cc, when replying (as I am not subscribed to the mailing list or to the bug). Thanks.