On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, at 10:06 PM, Martin Quinson wrote:
> If you know how to program in python, you could try to come up with a
> prototype of po4a reimplementation. I'm getting the feeling that Perl
> is not the right choice anymore. But the prototype may be difficult
> because we use the regular expressions so much. Scala would probably
> be easier, but I would not say that Scala is a much wiser choice here.
> I dunno what Scala will become in the next decade (which may be the
> last decade for Perl).
we could use perl6 :P
or ruby! ;-)
Seriously, I am not sure that changing languages buys us a lot if we
don't think through the architecture first. One question I would like to
have to explore is "How many of our formats now have canonical or 'really
good' processors that we could leverage instead of writing new parsers?"
+1
--
Marco Ciampa
I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.
------------------------
GNU/Linux User #78271
FSFE fellow #364
------------------------