[Po4a-devel]Some details

Hello, here are some doubts / little things I've found while messing around with the code: When adding a new module, one should add the module itself, the tests about it, modify the test 1 to verify the new module's syntax, and modify the chooser module to show the new module as available. It would be nice if those last two things could be automatic. For example adding a new function on each module that returns its description and a boolean that tells if it's active or experimental (well, I'm sure you'll find better ways for doing this :P). This way, the test1 could test all the active (non-experimental) modules, and the chooser could get the list of all available modules and their descriptions without modifying them. This could also enhance the translation of the list of available formats, because now, each time a new module appears, the chooser string is modified, and translators have to translate almost everything again. (Should I send it as a feature request to alioth?) The Chooser.pm file header talks about the Pod module and not about himself. It's only an aesthetic issue :P (I haven't watched the other modules) I haven't been able to find the main po4a man page, although most of the other man pages refer to it. Does it exist? Isn't it installed along with the other ones? It seems that t/10-data is the same as t/data-10. Could one of them go away? Another possible feature request: would it be so difficult to get the master document (when gettextizing, or translating...) from stdin? This way, for example as the Dia diagrams are normaly compressed, one could do something like: gunzip < document.dia | po4a-translate... And now some personal questions: Is there any way to test the modules while developing them without doing a make install? I didn't achieve it. And the last one (for now): How could I see the po4a program translations in action? (I refer to the french one in the CVS and the spanish I'm doing). I've tried something like LANG=fr po4a-gettextize and things like that, but all appears in english, like before. What am I missing? That's all. Thanks in advance for your attention. (I hope not to be a pain with all these things ;) Regards, Jordi Vilalta