po4a-Bugs item #314748 was changed at 12.07.2014 01:14 by Alexander Golubev You can respond by visiting: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410622&aid=31... Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Alexander Golubev (fat-zer-guest) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Text.pm: add an option to force no wrap lines in translated text Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: subj; such option may be useful when e.g. translating a docbook witch includes shell scripts directly to it self and the translator wants to get the same structure on output. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexander Golubev (fat-zer-guest) Date: 12.07.2014 01:14 Message: Here is the promised patch. I haven't done any unittest's yet because the Text module has no such yet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexander Golubev (fat-zer-guest) Date: 11.07.2014 16:46 Message: The patch accept 1 option --wrap with one of 3 parameters: auto : wrap lines, the current behavior force_no : no line wrapping: the lines in the translation will be broken on the same place as they were in the source. no : even I don't clearly understand that's that option does =) it supposed to broke lines in special formats: asciidoc, control, debianchangelog, etc only if there are some special conditions. Although, I'm not really into those formats so I don't really know how that supposed to be done... So IMO it would be better to stay only with 1 boolean option "--no-wrap" or "--force-no-wrap" to behave like the "--wrap=forse_no" in the current patch. I'll prepare the new patch in a day... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Quinson (mquinson) Date: 09.07.2014 00:44 Message: I would feel better if you could provide a little test case in the t/ directory to ensure that it works as expected (and that it still does in the future). Also, I have a doubt about the fact that --auto accepts a comma separated list of tags that should be wrapped. It seems to me that your patch accepts a boolean option where wrap is completely disabled or not, am I wrong? If so, tests cases would be welcome. If I'm right please update the doc. In any case, many thanks for the report and for the patch! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexander Golubev (fat-zer-guest) Date: 07.07.2014 14:20 Message: Here is a proposed patch... But somebody should review it... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410622&aid=31...