Re: [Po4a-devel]Addendums in po4a-translate

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:42:15PM +0200, Jordi Vilalta wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen that po4a-translate handles the addendums itself, instead of > using the transtractor's process() handling of addendums. Is there a > reason for it? None that I can remember of. It may be to work out a problem with the handling of addendums within process. It may be related to the cryptic TODO entry: ** TransTractor.pm - process(): $self->addendum($file) || die "An addendum failed\n"; Yes, I guess this is it. process have no way to tell that a perticular document failed because of an addendum, and still process with the next ones. > It would be interesting to use process() to apply the addendums so that > the encoding issues are centralized. I agree. If you fix the above issue and get it working, it would be really good. What do you think? After or before 0.17.2 ?