3:55 p.m.
Give me your tired, your huddled masses,
Yearning to breathe free.
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
� Emma Lazarus
The influx of Europeans into North America led the Indian populations to displacement and
eventually to consignation on reservations. Similarly, relentless Jewish immigration into
Palestine was against the interests of the Palestinian people, but it was necessary for
the Jewish takeover of the region. It laid the foundation for the Zionist State.Any tribe,
race or nation desiring to preserve its culture, group interests and sovereignty must
preserve its predominant status in the geographic region in which it dwells. Most nations
have had a fundamental understanding of that fact from the time of the earliest
civilizations, and every modern nation has sought strict control of its borders and
immigration.
Most Americans view the Indian historical record of resistance to European colonization as
morally justifiable, but in the skewed ethics of today, some find European-American
attempts to preserve our unique genes and culture from non-European immigration - morally
reprehensible. Nevertheless, despite pervasive propaganda promoting multiculturalism and
the media-touted joys of diversity, opinion surveys in America show overwhelming
opposition to unrestricted immigration. Similar public sentiment holds true in every
European nation.
It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress ignored the majority�s
wishes and began a policy that discriminated against potential European immigrants, and
encouraged massive non-European immigration. From that time forward, the federal
government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration laws and police our
borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non-White immigrants, legal and illegal.
Immigration and higher non-White birthrates have transformed the American population from
almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent at the end of the
century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that by the middle of the 21st century, well
within the lifetime of many reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in
the United States. We are already a minority in most of America�s major cities and will
soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies similar to those enacted in the U.S.
have introduced large numbers of non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North
Africans and Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien races into
Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy.
As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the new immigration policies
of the United States and Europe would greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time
after the change in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected
nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare problems increased. As this
planned racial transformation accelerates, these ills will reach catastrophic
proportions.
What groups had anything to gain from this demographic Armageddon? The individual
foreigners who could benefit from the economic opportunities afforded by the Western
societies had little political or economic clout while outside the Western nations. As I
looked into the American fight over immigration laws during the last 100 years, the
driving force behind opening America�s borders became evident: It was organized Jewry,
personified by the poet Emma Lazarus whose lines I quoted to begin the chapter.
By the time I was a junior in high school, I had become convinced that massive
non-European immigration poised the greatest short and long-term threat to the America
that I loved. I saw that the Immigration Act of 1965, unless repealed, would eventually
sound the death knell for my country. Much of the material I read pointed to a long
history of organized Jewish efforts to radically change America�s immigration laws. I
contacted Drew Smith, an elderly New Orleans attorney who had authored The Legacy of the
Melting Pot, and who had already taught me a lot about the immigration issue.[869]
Smith and I met one rainy day after school at the Citizens Council offices. He explained
the history of American immigration law. After quoting the Lazarus lines from the base of
the Statue of Liberty, he asked me, �Whose interest could have been served in having
America flooded with �wretched refuse�?� He quickly answered his own question. �It was in
the perceived interest of a cohesive people who use racial solidarity like a weapon, a
weapon they want only for themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law
and ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost exclusively by Jews.�
Smith explained that Emma Lazarus � like many other immigration activists � was a Jewish
partisan who supported the creation of an exclusively Jewish Zionist state in Palestine,
but who supported �diversity� for America. He pointed out to me how Jews such as Lazarus
have even changed the modern meaning of the Statue of Liberty. The beautiful jade-colored
colossus had no original connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island
immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the American Revolution, not
to honor the arrival of �wretched refuse� on America�s shores. It is instructive to note
that this beautiful statue of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South
America, but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself.
Emma Lazarus had been best known for her fulminations against Russia�s pogroms following
the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1881. The irony is rich: A Jewish supremacist
dedicated to the creation of an elite Jewish State in Palestine was anxious to turn
America into a refuge for the castoffs of the world. Drew Smith owned many books on the
immigration issue, including some by Jews, in which he had underlined important passages.
I borrowed them and passionately delved into them.
Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress led (and still lead) the effort
to liberalize American immigration and defeat restrictionist legislation. In 1921, 1924,
and 1952, Congress passed legislation that simply attempted to maintain the racial status
quo in America. Interestingly enough, even though Anglo Americans were in a vast majority
of the American population as well as in Congress, they did not attempt to increase their
own percentage of the American population, but simply sought to fairly maintain each
group�s status quo. In the early legislative battles, Jews were the leading advocates of
open immigration and vehemently opposed legislation that would maintain America as an
ethnically European, Christian nation. In the House of Representatives, Adolph Sabath,
Samuel Dickstein, and Emanuel Celler led the fight for unrestricted immigration, while in
the Senate, Herbert Lehman and in later years Jacob Javits coordinated the effort.
In the early struggles, Representative Leavitt clearly outlined the Jewish involvement in
remarks before Congress.
The instinct for national and race preservation is not one to be condemned�. No one
should be better able to understand the desire of Americans to keep America American than
the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Sabath], who is leading the attack on this measure, or
the gentlemen from New York, Mr. Dickstein, Mr. Jacobstein, Mr. Celler, and Mr. Perlman.
They are of the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their
race throughout the centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen
people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity
means a change of ideals. That fact should make it easy for them and the majority of the
most active opponents of this measure in the spoken debate to recognize and sympathize
with our viewpoint, which is not so extreme as that of their own race, but only demands
that the admixture of other peoples shall be only of such kind and proportions and in such
quantities as will not alter racial characteristics more rapidly than there can be
assimilation as to ideas of government as well as of blood. (Congressional Record, April
12, 1924.)[870]
Sociologist Edward A. Ross, in his influential 1914 book The Old World and the New: The
Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People, quotes the famous
pro-immigration leader Israel Zangwill as suggesting that America is an ideal place to
achieve Jewish interests. Ross then bluntly writes about the Jewish influence.
Jews therefore have a powerful interest in immigration policy: Hence the endeavor of
the Jews to control the immigration policy of the United States. Although theirs is but a
seventh of our net immigration, they led the fight on the Immigration Commission�s bill�.
The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for
restriction and to calm nativist fears is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is
behind the National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications.[871]
In 1924 Congressman Knud Wefald pointed out the Communist ties of many of the Jewish
immigrants and stated that many Jews have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals.�
The leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has come into the hands
of these clever newcomers who have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals � who
detect our weaknesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices they
render us.
Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest
of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories [and]
they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers.
(Congressional Record, April 12, 1924.[872]
The last important congressional legislation passed to protect the status quo of America
was the Walter-McCarran act of 1952. Congressional opposition was led by the Jewish troika
of Celler, Javits, and Lehman. Every major Jewish organization (as well as the Communist
Party USA) also lined up to oppose it, including the American Jewish Congress, American
Jewish Committee, the ADL, National Council of Jewish Women, and dozens of others. During
congressional debate, Francis Walter noted that the only civic organization that opposed
the entire bill was the American Jewish Congress. Representative Celler noted that Walter
�should not have overemphasized as he did the people of one particular faith who are
opposing the bills.� (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[873]
When Jewish Judge Simon Rifkind testified against the bill in joint hearings, he
emphasized that in supporting breaking down U.S. immigration law, he represented �the
entire body of religious and lay opinion within the Jewish group, religiously speaking,
from the extreme right and extreme left.�[874]
It thrilled me to read the courageous remarks of Mississippi Congressman John Rankin
during the debate. Today such truthful comments by any elected official would bring a
torrent of abuse that few could withstand.
They whine about discrimination. Do you know who is being discriminated against? The
white Christian people of America, the ones who created this nation�. I am talking about
the white Christian people of the North as well as the South. . . .
Communism is racial. A racial minority seized control in Russia and in all her
satellite countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia and many other countries I could
name.
They have been run out of practically every country in Europe in the years gone by,
and if they keep stirring race trouble in this country and trying to force their
Communistic program on the Christian people of America, there is no telling what will
happen to them here. (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[875]
Finally, in 1965, the goal first advanced by Jewish organizations in the 1880s came to
fruition when Congress passed the Immigration Act. It has resulted in immigration becoming
90 percent non-European. America went from an immigration program meant to be
proportionately representative to all groups in the United States to one that
discriminated against Europeans. As with earlier legislation, Jewish representatives and
senators as well as powerful Jewish lobbying organizations led the assault. It succeeded
because during the 41 years since 1924, Jewish power had increased dramatically in
virtually all spheres of American life.
In 1951 Senator Jacob Javits authored an article called �Let�s Open Our Gates.�[876] that
called for massive unrestricted immigration. Javits and Representative Celler figured
prominently in the passage of the bill in 1965. Nine years before passage of the 1965
Immigration Act, the American Jewish Congress initially proposed the essential elements of
the bill and praised President Eisenhower for his �unequivocal opposition to the national
quota system.� In a 1956 editorial they praised him for �courageously taking a stand in
advance of even many advocates of liberal immigration policy and embraced a position which
had at first been urged by the American Jewish Congress and other Jewish agencies.�[877]
Jewish Motivation Behind Immigration
It would have been stupid and counterproductive for the Jewish organizations that pushed
for open borders to admit that they were motivated by interests that conflicted with those
of non-Jewish Europeans. They promoted open immigration as �patriotic.� From the early
days of the century, they made public pronouncements that multiculturalism and diversity
would be beneficial to the United States, cleverly masking their strategic
motivations.After the passage of the open immigration statutes of 1965, Jewish authors
such as Naomi W. Cohen felt much safer in revealing some of the real Jewish reasons for
promoting such policies. She wrote that, beginning with the persecutions in Russia in the
1880s through the Nazi occupation of Europe and into the Cold War tribulations in Eastern
Europe, open immigration in Western nations served Jewish interests because �survival
often dictated that Jews seek refuge in other lands.�[878] Cohen also wrote that a U.S.
internationalist foreign policy serves Jewish interests because �an internationally minded
America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries�[879] Perhaps
even more important, Cohen intimated that Jews saw open immigration policies as breaking
down the homogeneity and unity of America, creating a pluralistic society in which Jews
could thrive.In his monumental book A History of Jews in America, Howard Sachar notes that
pluralism supports �legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a
majority�s host society.�[880] So, in effect, by breaking down the integrity and cohesion
of America, Jews could increase their integrity and cohesion. Sachar goes on to explicitly
show how pluralism intensifies Jewish solidarity:
But Kallen�s influence extended really to all educated Jews: Legitimizing the
preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority�s host society, pluralism
functioned as intellectual anchorage for an educated Jewish second generation, sustained
its cohesiveness and its most tenacious communal endeavors through the rigors of the
Depression and revived anti-Semitism, through the shock of Nazism and the Holocaust, until
the emergence of Zionism in the post-World War II years swept through American Jewry with
a climactic redemptionist fervor of its own.[881]
Social psychologist Kevin MacDonald pointed out in A People That Shall Dwell Alone that
major anti-Semitic movements are usually found in ethnically homogeneous nations and that
�ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become just
one of many ethnic groups� and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified,
cohesive groups of Gentiles united in their opposition of Judaism.�[882] [883]
In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, Charles Silberman
writes that
American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly
rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of
attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this
belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of
American Jews to endorse �gay rights� and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called
�social issues.� [884]
John Higham, in his book Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban America, states in clear
terms that Jewish-sponsored changes in immigration law were a defeat of the political and
cultural representation of �the common people of the South and West.�[885]
During the decades leading up to opening the borders in 1965, Jewish groups had piously
stated that there should be no discrimination against any group in immigration and that
such could only be good for America. But, Richard Arens, staff director of the Senate
subcommittee that produced the Walter-McCarran Act, pointed out that the same Jewish
forces which were the most avid promoters of open immigration, hypocritically opposed
ethnic immigration they deemed unfavorable to their own interests.
One of the curious things about those who most loudly claim that the 1952 act is
�discriminatory� and that it does not make allowance for a sufficient number of alleged
refugees, is that they oppose admission of any of the approximately one million Arab
refugees in camps where they are living in pitiful circumstances after having been driven
out of Israel.[886]
Organized Jewry not only wants to prevent Arab refugees from returning to their homes in
Israel, they also oppose their coming to the United States. Do they see the displaced
Palestinians as potential political opponents? Jewish groups clearly promote forms of
multiculturalism that destroy Gentile cohesion, but not those which could threaten their
own group power. So clearly, their dedication to multiculturalism is purely a strategic
one; they want groups coming into the nation which can further pluralize American society
and destroy its cohesion, but not those groups whom they see as political threat.
Jewish-dominated political and media institutions have long promoted the demographic
invasion and dissolution of America. While the Jewish media demonize as �racists� those
who oppose the flood of non-White immigration into America, Canada and all the European
nations, Israel�s immigration policy that excludes non-Jews is condoned. A million
Palestinians fled their homes in the wake of the Israeli blitzkrieg takeover of Palestine.
They cannot return to their ancestral homeland, and many are forced to live in refugee
camps that are little more than concentration camps of want and squalor.
A. M. Rosenthal is the long-time editor of perhaps the most influential newspaper in
America, the Jewish-owned New York Times. A hawkish supporter of Israel, he only complains
about the Zionist state when it is not Zionist enough for his taste. Yet, in a 1992
editorial Rosenthal feels obligated to criticize another country which desires to preserve
its racial integrity and cultural heritage:
They would do better to set a quota on immigrants and nurture a more pluralist society
by adopting a formula for citizenship based on residence than blood ties.
Equally distressing is Bonn�s failure to revise an outdated naturalization law rooted
in ethnicity. Under the existing system, a Turkish guest worker who has lived in Germany
for 30 years and speaks German fluently is denied the citizenship automatically granted a
Russian-speaking immigrant who can prove German ancestry. [887]
Rosenthal likens current German immigration policies to that of the Nazis. Yet, is Israeli
immigration law so different?
Not only Germany, but every White nation is a target of Rosenthal�s open immigration
advocacy. Only Israel�s immigration policy � the most draconian of all � is immune from
criticism. In America, Rosenthal identifies himself as the offspring of an illegal
immigrant (his father) and even lauds the immigration of Haitians, many of whom are drug
users and HIV-positive.
Almost always now, when I read about Haitians who risk the seas to get to this country
but wind up behind barbed wire, I think of an illegal immigrant I happen to know myself,
and of his daughters and his son [himself]�.
Even reluctantly recognizing some economic limitations, this country should have the
moral elegance to accept neighbors who flee countries where their life is terror and
hunger, and are run by murderous gangs�.
If that were a qualification for entry into our Golden land, the Haitians should be
welcomed with song, embrace and memories.[888]
As a chronic reader of The New York Times, I have yet to read a Rosenthal editorial
calling for the acceptance into Israel of the million or more Palestinians who are forced
by Israel to live in the dire poverty of the refugee camps. Nor has Rosenthal ever called
upon Jews to welcome Palestinian refugees into Israel with �song and embrace.� Rosenthal
is not stupid, but he is profoundly hypocritical. He knows that making full citizens of
all the Palestinians currently in Israel and all those in refugee camps outside its
borders would quickly sweep away the Zionist political state in the same way that
non-European immigration erodes the America of our forefathers.
On the other side of the coin, Rosenthal knows that Israel could not have been created but
for their emigration-invasion of Palestine. Looking at the historical record, should
Palestinians have welcomed the Jewish immigrants with song and embrace? Rosenthal has no
more regard for traditional Americans anymore than he has for the original Palestinian
inhabitants of what is now called Israel. He has only one overwhelming concern: Jewish
Supreamcism.
Rosenthal is proud of what he and many other Jews are: aliens as much as the wetbacks with
whom he identifies. He lives here, partaking of all the advantages of American
citizenship, but he will not � and cannot � become a real American who places the
interests of America above those of the Zionist agenda.
As the Jews become more brazen in their exercise of power, some now boast of their role in
dispossessing the European-Gentile American. Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the
Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League
of B�nai B�rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:
It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to
eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political
coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those
changes.[889]
Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has
happened, he looks forward to �constitutional constraints� (restriction of freedom of
speech?):
The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will
soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped
beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about
half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of
our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints
against bigotry more practical than ever. [890]
As Raab says, Zionist Jewish activists who have supported an exclusively Jewish-run
national state have been nourishing massive nontraditional immigration into America, and
they look forward to the time when the voting demographics of the United States reflect
that transformation.
I wonder if Zionist Israel Zangwill � who coined the term �melting pot� � envisioned his
Jewish state as a melting pot of Jew and Arab; of Islam and Judaism. Given the
ethnocentrism of Zionism, I rather doubt it. One American cartoonist wrote that the
problem with a melting pot is that �The bottom always gets burned, and the scum rises to
the top.� It is true that America has seen a melting of the different nationalities of
Europe into a traditional American majority, but in spite of the pervasive race-mixing
propaganda of the Jewish media, there has been no great melting of the White and Black,
and only marginal melting of the Mestizo and Anglo elements. However, what these Zionists
have not yet been able to accomplish through their advocacy of miscegenation, they are in
the process of achieving through massive immigration and differential birthrates.
Jews have also promoted, through �zero-population� advocates such as Paul Ehrlich, smaller
families among the natural leaders of the American majority. Jewish promotion of the
women�s liberation movement and abortion on demand has lowered the birthrate of America�s
most productive and educated classes. Their blunt desire is the dissolution of the
European race in the West by any means necessary. Continued massive non-European
immigration satisfies
these aims.
In summary, massive non-White immigration has been one of the most effective weapons of
organized Jewry in its cultural and ethnic war against the European American. We cannot
win this life and death struggle until our people realize that we are in the midst of a
war � and our side is suffering great losses. To lose this war would mean the destruction
of our American culture, heritage, and freedoms. It would mean nothing less than the
destruction of the very genes that have made possible all the social, cultural and
spiritual creations that distinguish our civilization. Our voices are muted by mass media
that are in the hands of our enemies. Too many of us are silently witnessing the genocide
of our people. The time is late. We must speak out now and defend ourselves. We must fight
for the continuation of the magnificent culture bequeathed to us by our forefathers. We
must take whatever action necessary to insure the future of our children and our
generations to come. As is true for all living things, we must fight for our right to
live.
America is in many ways already occupied similarly to the Israeli occupation of Palestine.
Jewish Supremacists control the news, publishing and entertainment media, they control our
elections and politicians, and now they are orchestrating a massive immigration into our
land that will make us a politically and culturally impotent minority in the same way that
the people of Palestine have suffered that fate. They seek to make our country into a
tower of Babel in which they will occupy the top floors.
Not only are Americans on the road to oblivion from immigration, but so are our brethren
across Europe. Indeed, many nations are under the Jewish Supremacist drive toward
globalization, and the destruction of any sort of ethnic or national pride and
cohesiveness that could pose a threat to their hegemony. They seek to remake the world
into an unremarkable mass of atomistic, deracinated individuals incapable of collective
resistance.
If we remain silent in this critical time in our people�s history, our people will be
extinguished and silent forever.
This maxim is not only true for Europeans and Americans, but for all the peoples of the
Earth.
References
869. Smith, Drew L. (1971). The Legacy Of The Melting Pot. North Quincy, Massachusetts.
Christopher Publishing House
870. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,265-6,266.
871. Ross, E. A. (1914). The Old World And The New: The Significance Of Past And Present
Immigration To The American People. New York: The Century Co. p.144..
872. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,272.
873. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 2,285.
874. Joint Hearings Before The Subcommittees Of The Committees On The Judiciary, 82nd
Congress, First Session,
On S. 716, H. R. 2379, And H. R. 2816. March 6April 9, 1951. 563
875. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 4,320.
876. Javits, J (1951) Let�s Open Our Gates New York Times Magazine July 8. p.8, 33.
877. Congress Weekly. (1956). Editorial of February 20. p.3
878. Cohen, N. W. (1972). Not Free To Desist: The American Jewish Committee 1906-1966.
Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society Of America.
879. Ibid. p.342.
880. Sachar, H. (1992). A History Of Jews In America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
881. Ibid. p.427.
882. MacDonald, K. B. (1994). A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism As A Group
Evolutionary Strategy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
883. MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Separation And Its Discontents: Toward An Evolutionary
Theory Of Anti-Semitism. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
884. Silberman, C. E. (1985). A Certain people: American Jews and Their Lives Today. New
York: Summit Books.
885. Higham , J. (1984). Send These To Me: Immigrants In Urban America. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
886. Bennett, M. T. (1963). American Immigration Policies: A History. Washington, DC:
Public Affairs Press. p.181.
887. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9.
888. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9.
889. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). July. 23.
890. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). Feb. 19.
Source :
http://www.davidduke.com/general/my-awakening-chapter-24-the-jewish-role-...
-------------------------------------
You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to Lawrence Auster's
Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know by calling
to 1 212 865 1284
Thanks,
Lawrence Auster,
238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
New York, NY 10025
Contact : lawrence.auster(a)att.net
-------------------------------------